|
1
|
|
|
2
|
- March/April 2002 - Universities UK releases guide to management of IP –
this Guide is expected to kick start the development of IP policies in
Universities to meet the new emphasis on value extraction.
- 4 January 2002 - Cornell University sues HP over patent infringement –
Cornell claims that one of its patents has been infringed by HP since
1995, and is seeking $100 million.
- 4 December 2001 - Michael Porter says that the Netherlands is lagging
behind in innovation and as knowledge based economy – Institutional
structure of research institutes must change so that new scientific
knowledge leads to genuine innovations within the private sector and
that universities must undergo an attitude shift so that a better
dialogue can be established between university researchers and
companies.
- July 2001 - Victory for Student Patent Rights in Chou v. University of
Chicago – For years, student researchers have alleged that the
hierarchical system in academic research allows supervising PhDs to
patent inventions that were rightfully made and owned by students. The
US Courts have now interpreted the law in a way that strictly protects
the rights of student researchers. Student researchers will now be able
to sue their supervising PhDs for any actions that are not in the best
interests of the student researcher or of his patent rights.
- 19 February 1990 - University Sues Its Own Professor In Patent Dispute –
The University of Pennsylvania sued its own professor over the ownership
in patent rights in a new pharmaceutical. This highlights the
difficulties which can be encountered if there is no adequate policy on
ownership at the outset of a research project.
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- It protects an invention
- It lasts for up to twenty years
- It has to be applied for
|
|
6
|
- It protects the appearance of a design
- It lasts for up to twenty five years
- It has to be applied for
|
|
7
|
- It protects the appearance of a design
- It can last 15 years
- It is a copy right
- It is automatic
|
|
8
|
- What is a patentable invention?
- What is a registrable design?
|
|
9
|
- Novel
- Not obvious
- Not specifically excluded by law
- Has technical effect (Europe)
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
- Intangible discoveries and ideas
- Aesthetic creations (copyright)
- Methods of –
- Performing mental acts
- Playing games
- Doing business
- Computer programs
- Presentations of information
|
|
16
|
- Laws of nature
- Natural phenomena
- Abstract ideas
|
|
17
|
- Explicitly allows ‘business method’ patents
- Patentability based on
- Practical application of abstract idea
- Providing a useful, concrete and tangible result
|
|
18
|
- Explicitly excludes business methods as such
- Requires a technical effect
|
|
19
|
- Hub and spoke trading system
- Computer implemented (probably)
- Processing data to derive a resulting share price
- Patent upheld
|
|
20
|
- Patent application for:
- A method and system for managing a pension scheme
- Effect – reduction of financial overheads
- Rejected on final appeal
- Merely method of doing business as such
- Lacked a technical effect
|
|
21
|
- Eye appeal
- Novelty
- Features applied to an article:
- Shape
- Configuration
- Pattern
- Ornament
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
- The IA Equals team
- KPMG’s Intellectual Property Services
- Lara Quelch, K Legal
- Ed Round, K Legal
- Daan Andriessen, KPMG
- TaylorNelsonSofres
|
|
32
|
- www.intellectualpropertynet.com
- Melvyn Ingleson
- MJI Business Solutions
- +44 1505 614745
|